A site dedicated to the rational study of the UMMO affair
D33-1 Indeterminism and free will [ Letter 1 ]
Language Spanish
No. of Copies 1
23 MARCH 1966
Professor Sesma Manzano
MADRID
337. SPECULATIONS CONCERNING THE REASONS FOR THE GENERATION OF THE OEMMII (HUMAN BODY) WITHIN WAAM (COSMOS).
Undoubtedly, a subject as transcendent as the existence of man in the WAAM (UNIVERSE) must arouse our attention.
But we observe a notable difference between the spiritual appetites of the Humanity of UMMO and that of OOYAGAA (That is what we call your Planet EARTH).
Our thought has always been guided by an orientation that bears a vague analogy with the Pragmatism of the terrestrial Philosopher John Dewey. We value all knowledge on a scale whose highest level is occupied by functionality.
What is functional for the Philosophy of UMMO is that, in principle:
AIOOYA OEMII = MAN EXISTS
AIOOYA AMMIE WOA = WOA EXISTS
AIOOYA AMMIE BUUAWA = THE SOUL EXISTS
As the “WHY” is not accessible to us by empirical-scientific methods (See FIRST NOTE at the end of this report before reading on), we refrain from dogmatizing.
Of course we speculate as you terrestrials do, but there is a notable difference:
When one of your thinkers develops a Philosophical Theory, a School arises alongside it which is followed fanatically and with scant critical spirit by thousands and even millions of men, adhering to his doctrine and his postulates as if they were irrefutable truths
We, on the contrary, before any doctrinal statement, adopt a gentle and prudent UBOO (AGNOSTIC) stance. It being well understood that this Agnosticism does not go so far as to judge, like yours, that WOA is not accessible in a certain way and to a certain degree to our scientific experience.
WE CREATE DOCTRINES BUT WE ARE NOT SO NAIVE AS TO BELIEVE THEM.
Apparently such an attitude seems to amount to a contradiction. It seems stupid to develop hypotheses only to despise them afterwards.
That is not what we meant to convey to you. We know that such Hypotheses may come close to the truth, and in fact one of them will coincide with it some day. We show that at least an explanation can exist (even if it is not the one stated) for certain transcendent enigmas, and lastly such speculations constitute, in the worst of cases, excellent mental gymnastics that sooner or later bear fruit.
After this Preamble, we inform you that we have indeed developed laborious Hypotheses to explain to ourselves the existence of OEMMII in the WAAM (UNIVERSE).
Being unable to set them out at length, we are obliged to formulate them in a few brief paragraphs, even though so limited a synthesis entails the risk of seeming puerile and lacking in depth.
334. ANTHROPOMORPHIC CONCEPTION OF WOA (GOD): ITS RISKS.
An error into which certain Terrestrial thinkers fall all too often is to adopt inadvertently an ANTHROPOMORPHIC conception of GOD or GENERATOR.
When many men of your Planet torment themselves trying to find transcendent explanations for questions such as:
WHY DOES GOD TOLERATE EVIL?
WHAT USE TO GOD IS THIS OR THAT ACTION OF HIS?
They unconsciously use verbs that are only attributable to an AAIODI (BEING) such as MAN.
Imagine a fictitious thinking animal that, referring to the OEMII, also asked itself:
WHY DOES MAN RAIN?
HOW DO PLATINUM OR SULPHUR DIGEST AND MEDITATE?
This psychological phenomenon of Projection, which assigns human attributes to other entities, is as common among you as the tendency to attribute the Dimension TIME to BUUAWA or WOA, and it constitutes, besides a continual Source of errors, another of alienating effects, that is, of mental disturbances, since, being unable logically to find coherent answers to such badly formulated questions, you end up doubting the very existence of God or of the Entity to which you attribute that false function, provoking at the same time certain neurotic states of anxiety.
It is curious how, having laid in these last years the foundations of a mathematical Logic, you still fall into such crude sophisms.
337. POSSIBILITY OF A TRANSCENDENT FUNCTION OF OEMII (MAN) IN THE UNIVERSE.
Let us remember that one of the functions of WOA is to GENERATE. All those of His ideas that are not incompatible with His very ESSENCE must be EXCRETED, that is, must TAKE FORM, BE REALISED, NECESSARILY.
When we put forward the Hypothesis of WAAMWAAM (PLURICOSMOS), it is because we observe that in our UNIVERSE and in the UWAAM (COMPLEMENTARY COSMOS OF INVERSE ELECTRIC CHARGE) a very small number of EAAIODI GOO (ONTOLOGICAL) POSSIBILITIES OF EXISTENCE are realised.
Indeed: We know some of the Physical and Biological Laws that govern our Universe, but: could these laws have been stated in another form? If the answer is positive, such LAWS exist in another WAAM (UNIVERSE).
So that if the idea of an adimensional and FREE BEING, shaper of another dimensional BEING, IS NOT INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ESSENCE OF WOA, such a BEING must BE GENERATED.
The GENERATION of man is not motivated, then, by “recreational” reasons, by an itch for “amusement” on the part of WOA, who might thus delight in watching us struggle between Pain and Joy like mere puppets in His hands. Such an interpretation is childish and can be described as anthropomorphic.
We can still formulate another question: Why did He generate us in this form, with two feet, with that neurocortical structure, with those sexual tendencies... and not with others?
The question is captious [*], for it carries implicitly the aprioristic assertion that WOA has ONLY generated men with such a physiological structure, contrary to the principle expressed in the preceding paragraph.
Indeed. It is possible (and empirical knowledge supports us) that in this WAAM (UNIVERSE), and adapting to the biological laws prevailing in it, only HUMAN BEINGS (that is: Possessing BUUAWA: SOUL) have this physiological morphology, but that is no obstacle to WOA having generated a multitude of diverse FREE BEINGS in as many other WAAM.
We come at last to a final point:
IS THERE A FUNCTIONALISM OF MAN IN THE COSMOS?
That is: Does the OEMMII fulfil some mission within the WAAM? Of course, such functionalism can coexist with the necessity of its generation. To attempt to offer an explanation that is at least satisfactory, we must not forget that the components of WAAM (UNIVERSE) can be divided into two dimensional categories.
MICROPHYSICAL: And therefore enjoying the principle of INDETERMINACY. That is: Not subject to any LAW.
MACROPHYSICAL: Subject to the mathematical-statistical laws that govern their inflexible DETERMINISM.
Once the UNIVERSE has been generated as a MASS-SPACE-TIME continuum, Woa has two means of bringing about a modification of its structural rigidity, its deterministic inflexibility.
A) BY MODIFYING THE LAWS THAT GOVERN IT. We think, quite logically, that this might perhaps imply a contradiction once they had been stated for a WAAM.
B) BY GENERATING FREE BEINGS who, taking advantage of the freedom of the microphysical elements, could act through them on the MACROPHYSICAL ones, breaking their causal or deterministic submission.
This is how WOA would use man as a factor of ACTION linking Him with the WAAM created by HIM. WOA thus dictates His UAA (LAWS), and man, by fulfilling them, acts as a link between HIM and the COSMOS.
If man does not fulfil them, the harmony is apparently broken, since he distorts his functionality in the AAIODIWOA (it can be translated as CREATION, the SET OF DIMENSIONAL and ADIMENSIONAL BEINGS generated by WOA).
In that case the BUUAWA responsible for such a distortion must conform its spiritual structure to the idea of WOA. We give this reconformation the name of PUNISHMENT (PURGATORY for you) (AMMIEYIISAIA BUUAWA on UMMO).
We have reasons to consider that in reality the genuine reasons will be much more complex, and perhaps inaccessible to the limited human intellect.
The arguments developed serve nonetheless to prove that at least SOME EXPLANATION EXISTS for the transcendent enigma of our existence. In this way we can counter possible materialist objections which, finding no plausibility in that EXISTENCE, might try to wield the lack of Arguments as proof of the non-existence of WOA.
FIRST NOTE . In a small additional report we shall develop for you our theory concerning the scientific inaccessibility of the factors assumed within adimensional AAIODI (ENTITIES or BEINGS). You will receive this note immediately, when we consider that you have had time to assimilate the preceding REPORT. Back
* U-C Note: RAE (dictionary of the Spanish Royal Academy) - Capciosa (captious): Said of a question,.../...: One that is asked in order to draw from the opponent or interlocutor an answer .../... that favours the purposes of whoever asks it
